SERIOUS CRIME / Terrorism 

R v R

The case was prosecuted by appointed Treasury Counsel, due to the sensitive religious, cultural and political aspects involved.

It was alleged that violence was planned as revenge in the United Kingdom as a direct retaliation against the followers of those who had desecrated the Sikh holy scriptures in Punjab, India previously over an eighteen month period. The defence team’s instruction of experts enabled the successful exclusion of damaging material. Narita’s client’s case was distinct from all other co-defendants and therefore involved exercising calm judgement and a brave approach in the forensic analysis and presentation of the case. Narita’s client was found Not Guilty.