Narita Bahra KC secured acquittals for her client dubbed “The Master Mind” in three multi handed drugs conspiracies, involving encrypted telephones

Narita Bahra KC secured acquittals for her client dubbed “The Master Mind” in three multi handed drugs conspiracies, involving encrypted telephones

Serious Crime 

Drugs Conspiracies & Encrochat

R v AP

Narita Bahra KC secured acquittals for her client dubbed “The Master Mind” in three multi handed drugs conspiracies, involving encrypted telephones.

The Prosecution alleged the client was the leading figure in three separate drugs conspiracies; arranging the exportation, production and supply of Class A, B and C drugs through prestigious universities. The Crown alleged that the drugs were supplied in UK universities and flown out of the UK in private jets for young high net worth purchasers. 

The co-defendants were tried a year before, given the police were unable to locate the client internationally, at the time of the original two trials. Narita acted for the clientwhen he voluntarily surrendered himself years later, after having secured acquittals for a co-defendant (dubbed second in command) in the earlier trial. 

The Crown sought to rely on a combination of encrypted telephones, cell site, digital media, telephone and DNA evidence to secure a conviction against the client.

After extensive preparation and representations by the defence team, the prosecution conceded the written dismissal application and agreed to Offer No Evidence against their client. Not Guilty verdicts were entered on all counts.

Serious Crime 

Drugs Conspiracies & Encrochat

R v AP

Narita Bahra KC secured acquittals for her client dubbed “The Master Mind” in three multi handed drugs conspiracies, involving encrypted telephones.

The Prosecution alleged the client was the leading figure in three separate drugs conspiracies; arranging the exportation, production and supply of Class A, B and C drugs through prestigious universities. The Crown alleged that the drugs were supplied in UK universities and flown out of the UK in private jets for young high net worth purchasers. 

The co-defendants were tried a year before, given the police were unable to locate the client internationally, at the time of the original two trials. Narita acted for the clientwhen he voluntarily surrendered himself years later, after having secured acquittals for a co-defendant (dubbed second in command) in the earlier trial. 

The Crown sought to rely on a combination of encrypted telephones, cell site, digital media, telephone and DNA evidence to secure a conviction against the client.

After extensive preparation and representations by the defence team, the prosecution conceded the written dismissal application and agreed to Offer No Evidence against their client. Not Guilty verdicts were entered on all counts.

Contact Narita Bahra KC

Narita Bahra KC practises from 33 Chancery Lane Chambers and is Direct Access Qualified.

Contact Narita Bahra KC

Narita Bahra KC practises from 33 Chancery Lane Chambers and is Direct Access Qualified.

Narita Bahra KC practises from 33 Chancery Lane Chambers and is Direct Access Qualified.

Contact Narita Bahra KC

For More Information:
0203 196 7822



nbkc@33cllaw.com

nbahra@garricklaw.com

© 2024 Narita Bahra. All Rights Reserved. Website Designed and Developed by Ada Studio

For More Information:
0203 196 7822



nbkc@33cllaw.com

nbahra@garricklaw.com

© 2024 Narita Bahra. All Rights Reserved. Website Designed and Developed by Ada Studio

News & Cases

Terms & Conditions

Instagram

LinkedIn


For More Information:
+ 44 (0) 203 196 7822



nbkc@33cllaw.com

nbahra@garricklaw.com

© 2024 Narita Bahra. All Rights Reserved. Website Designed and Developed by Ada Studio

News & Cases

Terms & Conditions

Instagram

LinkedIn


For More Information:
+ 44 (0) 203 196 7822



nbkc@33cllaw.com

nbahra@garricklaw.com

© 2024 Narita Bahra. All Rights Reserved. Website Designed and Developed by Ada Studio